(Sexual selection / Convergent evolution / Extreme adaptation)
In this section, Feynman discusses the
evolution of sexual selection that influences peacock’s
color vision and convergent evolution through the development of the octopus’s
eye, as well as mentions the giant squid's enormous eyes, but it could be
related to extreme adaptation. Simply phrased, the section is about the eyes of
peacock, octopus, and giant squid that are related to sexual
selection, convergent evolution, and extreme adaptation.
1. Peacock’s eye:
“Fish, butterflies, birds,
and reptiles can see color, but it is believed that most mammals cannot. The
primates can see color. The birds certainly see color, and that accounts for
the colors of birds. There would be no point in having such brilliantly colored
males if the females could not notice it! That is, the evolution of the sexual
“whatever it is” that the birds have is a result of the female being able to
see color (Feynman et
al., 1963, p. 36–9).”
Feynman says that the evolution of the sexual
“whatever it is” that the birds have is a result of the female being able to
see color. On the other hand, Darwin (1859) writes: “when the males and females
of any animal have the same general habits… but differ in structure, color, or
ornament, such differences have been mainly caused by sexual selection (p.
89).” Thus, one may explain that the evolution of sexual selection
influences the color vision in animals. In other words, many animals can see
color, which plays a crucial role in sexual selection. In peacocks, for
example, the vivid colors of males have evolved to attract females, indicating
that female birds’ ability to see color drives the development of bright
plumage.
“So
next time we look at a peacock and think of what a brilliant display of
gorgeous color it is, and how delicate all the colors are, and what a wonderful
aesthetic sense it takes to appreciate all that, we should not compliment the
peacock, but should compliment the visual acuity and aesthetic sense of the peahen,
because that is what has generated the beautiful scene! (Feynman et al., 1963, p. 36–9).”
In his lectures
titled QED delivered at UCLA for the public, Feynman explains the
iridescent feathers as a phenomenon of colors produced by the partial
reflection of white light by two surfaces. Furthermore, he adds, “[P]erhaps you
have wondered how the brilliant colors of hummingbirds and peacocks are
produced. Now you know. How those brilliant colors evolved is also an
interesting question. When we admire a peacock, we should give credit to the
generations of lackluster females for being selective about their mates (p.
35).” However, in a letter to Asa Gray, Darwin (1860) writes, “the sight of a
feather in a peacock’s tail, whenever I gaze at it, makes me sick!” Darwin
thought that the peacock’s feather did not support his theory of evolution
because the feather could make it difficult for the peacock to escape
predators.
2. Octopus’ eye:
“It is very interesting that, besides the development of its brain and
its reactions and so on, which are rather good for an invertebrate, it has also
developed, independently, a different eye. It is not a compound eye or an eye
spot—it has a cornea, it has lids, it has an iris, it has a lens, it has two
regions of water, it has a retina behind. It is essentially the same as the eye
of the vertebrates! It is a remarkable example of a coincidence in evolution
where nature has twice discovered the same solution to a problem, with one
slight improvement (Feynman et
al., 1963, p. 36–9).”
Convergent evolution refers to the evolution of very
similar traits independently in different organisms that are not closely
related (Roberts, 1986). In short, Feynman describes convergent evolution
through the development of the octopus’ eye.
The octopus’ eye is an example of convergent evolution, where similar
eye structures have independently evolved in both vertebrates and invertebrate
(or cephalopods). Despite being an invertebrate, the octopus has developed a
pair of eyes with a cornea, iris, lens, and retina, similar to vertebrate eyes.
However, the claim “nature has twice discovered the same solution to a problem”
is a simplification. While convergent evolution has led to similar structures,
the developmental pathways and genetic underpinnings of the eye differ
significantly.
“In the octopus it also turns out, amazingly, that the retina is a piece
of the brain that has come out in the same way in its embryonic development as
is true for vertebrates, but the interesting thing which is different is that
the cells which are sensitive to light are on the inside, and the
cells which do the calculation are in back of them, rather than “inside out,”
as in our eye (Feynman et
al., 1963, p. 36–9).”
Despite the similarities in function, the eyes of octopus
and human differ in their developmental origins, structural organization, and
focusing mechanisms. There are at least three important differences: (1) Retina
orientation: The retina of the octopus is directly
oriented towards incoming light and thus, the photoreceptor cells are in front
of the nerve fibers. On the contrary, the human retina is oriented in the
opposite direction as shown below. (2) Blind spots: The
octopus’ eye does not have a blind spot because the nerve fibers are behind the
photoreceptors; human eye has a blind spot due to the optic nerve exiting the
back of the eye, where there are no photoreceptors. (3) Photoreceptors: Octopus
typically have one type of photoreceptor, and some species are sensitive to
polarized light, which aids in navigation and detecting prey. On the other
hand, humans have three types of cones sensitive to red, green, and blue.
![]() |
Source: Roberts, 1986 |
3. Squid’s eye:
“The
biggest eyes in the world are those of the giant squid; they have been found up
to 15 inches in diameter! (Feynman et al., 1963, p. 36–9).”
Feynman only mentions that the biggest eyes in the world
are those of the giant squid that have been found up to 15 inches in
diameter. However, it is worthwhile to include the term extreme adaptation because
the giant squid has adapted to living in the deep sea by developing a large
body size and enormous eyes that allow it to see in low-light conditions.
Specifically, the Atlantic giant squid (Architeuthis dux) has the largest eyes
in the world. It has been estimated that the record example from Thimble Tickle
Bay, Newfoundland, Canada, in 1878 had eyes measuring 40 cm (15.75 in) in
diameter (Breverton, 2013). Interestingly,
every octopus has eight arms – limbs with suckers
dotted all the way along, whereas a squid has not just eight arms but also two
tentacles, with suckers just at the end, which it uses to hunt fish and shrimp.
Octopus and squid
eyes share some similarities due to their common cephalopod lineage, but have
distinct differences reflective of their specific adaptations and lifestyles. Similarities:
Both octopus and squid eyes function like a camera, with a single lens focusing
light onto a retina, and have pupils that can change shape. Furthermore,
neither the octopus nor the squid eye has a blind spot because the optic nerve
does not pass through the retina. Differences: Squid often have larger eyes
relative to their body size compared to octopuses. For example, the colossal
squid has some of the largest eyes in the animal kingdom, which helps detect
faint light in the dark ocean depths. These differences manifest in aspects
like habitat-specific adaptations, eye size, light sensitivity, and behavioral
use of vision.
Review Questions:
1.
How would you explain the evolution of sexual selection influences the color vision of peacocks?
2.
How would you explain the concept of convergent
evolution through the octopus’ eye and human eyes?
3. How
would you explain the biggest eyes in the world are those of the giant squid due to extreme
adaptation?
The
moral of the lesson: this section highlights how sexual selection
influences color vision in animals, illustrates convergent evolution through
the development of the octopus eye, and demonstrates extreme adaptation of the
giant squid's enormous eyes.
References:
1. Breverton, T. (2013). Breverton's
Nautical Curiosities: A Book of the Sea. London: Quercus.
2. Darwin, C.
(1859). On the origin of species: facsimile of the first edition.
3. Darwin, C. (1993). The
correspondence of Charles Darwin. 8. 1860 (Vol. 8). Cambridge
University Press.
4. Feynman, R. P. (1985). QED: The strange theory of light and matter.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
5. Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., &
Sands, M. (1963). The Feynman
Lectures on Physics, Vol I: Mainly mechanics, radiation, and
heat. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Roberts, M. B. V.
(1986). Biology: a functional approach. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
No comments:
Post a Comment