(1-D Velocity
addition / Constant speed of light /
2-D Velocity addition)
In this
section, Feynman discusses velocities addition in one dimension and two
dimensions, as well as verifies the constant speed of light using the
velocities addition formula.
1. 1-D Velocity addition:
“Next we discuss the interesting problem of the
addition of velocities in relativity (Feynman
et al., 1963, section 16–3 Transformation of velocities).”
Feynman presents a general problem as follows: “an object is moving with
velocity v inside a space ship and
the space ship itself is moving with velocity u with respect to the ground. What is the apparent velocity vx of this object from the point of view of a man on the ground?” Feynman
derives the one-dimensional velocity addition formula (or longitudinal velocity
addition) of vx using the
ratio of x to t instead of the formula vx = Dx/Dt. He clarifies
that the velocity of a moving
object as seen by the outside observer is equal to the observer’s distance divided
by the observer’s time and it should not be the moving man’s time. In general, we can substitute Dx = g(Dx¢+uDt¢) and
Dt = g(Dt¢+uDx¢/c2) into vx = Dx/Dt = (Dx¢+uDt¢)/(Dt¢+uDx¢/c2) and simplify it into (u+vx¢)/(1+uvx¢/c2).
The symbols used in
velocities addition may be revised as follows: let u be the velocity of an object measured by an observer in S frame and u¢ be
the velocity measured by another observer in S¢ frame. We may also use the symbol v to
represent the relative velocity between the S frame and S¢ frame. Alternatively, we can use uA and uB to represent the velocities that are measured by A
and B respectively. Thus, the formula of relative velocity of an object
(or observer) A with respect to
another object B can be revised from uA – uB to (uA – uB)/(1 – uAuB/c2) that has a minus sign. If
the two objects are moving in an opposite direction, the formula can be
expressed as (|uA| + |uB|)/(1+|uA||uB|/c2) that has a plus sign.
2. Constant speed of light:
“… suppose that inside the space ship the man was
observing light itself. In other words, v = c, and yet the space
ship is moving. How will it look to the man on the ground? (Feynman et al., 1963, section 16–3 Transformation of
velocities).”
Feynman’s question may be rephrased as follows: “suppose that a light
beam is in a space ship that is moving at a constant velocity u with respect to the ground. What is
the apparent speed of light observed by a man on the ground?” By using the longitudinal
velocity addition formula, we obtain v = (u+c)/(1+uc/c2) = c. Feynman explains that this result is good because Einstein’s
theory of relativity was designed to do this in the first place. In a sense, it
is unnecessary to verify the velocity addition formula because Lorentz’s
equations are derived from the light postulate. Essentially, the transformation
of velocities is based on the “invariant” speed of light in vacuum that is independent
of the motion of an observer in any inertial frame of reference.
One may relate Einstein’s beam of light thought
experiment to the velocities addition formula.
In his Autobiographical Notes,
Einstein (1949) writes that “if I pursue a beam of
light with
the velocity c (velocity of light in
a vacuum), I should observe such a beam of light as an electromagnetic field at
rest though spatially oscillating. There seems to be no such thing, however,
neither on the basis of experience nor according to Maxwell’s equations... (pp.
49-51)” One
may also introduce this problem: “if an observer moves at the speed of light, what
will be the speed of light that is observed in the mirror and the speed of
light that is moving in the same direction as observed by the observer?”
Furthermore, physics teachers could let students verify the velocities addition
formula using two different velocities of light: v = (u±c)/(1±uc/c2) = c.
3. 2-D Velocity addition:
“… since the speed cy is less than the speed of light, the speed vy of the particle must be slower than the corresponding speed by the same
square-root ratio (Feynman et al., 1963, section 16–3 Transformation of
velocities).”
To illustrate the addition of velocities in two dimensions (or
transverse velocity addition), Feynman gives an example of an object inside a
ship which is just moving “upward” with the velocity vy′ with respect to a horizontally moving ship. He
shows that using the relevant Lorentz transformations and the results, y = y¢ = vy¢t′, we can deduce that if vx′ = 0, the vertical velocity of the object as measured by an observer on
the ground, vy = vy′Ö(1−u2/c2). However, Feynman did not explain how the factor Ö(1−u2/c2) is
related to time dilation. To be more comprehensive, we can explain that: if the
object’s velocity has a horizontal component, then Dx¢ is not zero and Dt = g(Dt¢ + uDx¢/c2). Thus,
the velocity of the object moving in two dimensions measured by an observer on
the ground is vy = Dy/Dt =Dy¢/g(Dt¢+uDx¢/c2) = vy′/g(1+uvx¢/c2).
According to Feynman, each click of the “particle clock” will coincide
with each n-th “click” of the light
clock because the physical phenomenon of coincidence will be a coincidence in
any frame. He concludes that the speed cy is less than the speed of light c and the speed vy of the particle must be
slower than the corresponding speed by the same square-root ratio. Importantly,
the square root ratio may be explained by Pythagoras theorem: a2 + b2 = c2. The apparent vertical speed of light (vy¢) in the moving frame, the horizontal
speed of the moving system (u) and
the speed of the light (c) are
related by the equation vy¢2 + u2 = c2. We may deduce that vy¢2 = c2 - u2 and thus, the ratio of the
two speeds: vy¢/c = Ö(1 – u2/c2). This is based on the light postulate that is
applicable to a light beam that is moving horizontally or any direction.
Questions for discussion:
1. How would you derive the relative velocity of
two objects in the context of special theory of relativity?
2. Do we need to verify that the speed of light
remains constant using the velocities addition formula?
3. How would you explain
that the speed vy of the particle in a moving space ship must be slower than the
corresponding speed vy′ by the same square-root ratio?
The moral of the lesson: the velocity of a moving object as observed by the
outside observer is equal to the
observer’s distance divided
by the observer’s time and it should not be the moving man’s time.
References:
1. Einstein, A. (1949/1979). Autographical notes (Translated by Schilpp). La Salle, Illinois:
Open court.
2. Feynman, R. P.,
Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. (1963). The
Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol
I: Mainly mechanics,
radiation, and heat. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
No comments:
Post a Comment