(Reasonable assumptions / Elastic collision / Inelastic
collision)
In this section, Feynman
discusses reasonable assumptions of relativistic mass, and the concept of
relativistic mass from the perspective of an elastic collision and inelastic
collision.
1. Reasonable assumptions:
“However, we can show that, as a consequence of relativity plus a
few other reasonable assumptions, the mass must vary in this way (Feynman et al., 1963, section 16–4 Relativistic mass).”
According to Feynman,
the concept of relativistic mass can be shown by making a few reasonable
assumptions: Firstly, we shall assume the conservation of momentum and energy by
analyzing a thought experiment involving a collision. Secondly, we shall assume
that the momentum of a moving particle is a vector and it is always directed in
the direction of the velocity. Thirdly, we shall assume the momentum is a function
of velocity instead of a constant times the velocity. In the previous
chapter, Feynman discusses the assumption of the energy of a body always
equals mc2. In short, one may also
mention that the two main assumptions in deriving the relativistic mass
expression are conservation
of momentum and Lorentz transformation of velocities.
Kaufmann–Bucherer experiments were
performed in the early 1900s to test different mathematical
models of relativistic mass. Specifically, experimental physicists used deflections of electrons by magnetic
fields to determine the expression of variation of mass with speed. These are indirect experiments that have limitations
in determining the mass of an object. Similarly, we do not have a direct
experiment that can prove the mass of a photon is strictly zero. For example,
physicists are unable to place a photon on a weighing scale to measure its
weight. In his Lectures on Gravitation
(for postgraduates), Feynman suggests how the mass of a photon is
infinitesimally small and “discuss the possibility that the mass is not of a
certain definite size (Feynman et al., 1995, p. 22).”
2. Elastic
collision:
“Two views of an
elastic collision between equal objects moving at the same speed in opposite
directions (Feynman et al., 1963, section 16–4 Relativistic mass).”
Feynman deduces the relativistic mass formula using an elastic collision between two identical objects moving at the same speed
in opposite directions. Instead of quickly asking what is the vertical velocity
u tan α, he could state the velocity
of particle 2 in Fig 16–3(a) is v, the
horizontal component is u and the
vertical component is x. Therefore,
tan α = x/u (vertical component of v
divided by horizontal component of v)
and it becomes trivial to deduce x = u tan α. If we let w be the vertical velocity of object 2 in the second frame of
reference, then the expected velocity of object 2 in the first frame of
reference would be wÖ(1–u2/c2). This expected velocity of object 2 can be calculated using the Lorentz
transformation of velocity or explained by the time dilation effect.
Based on the same elastic collision thought
experiment, Lewis and Tolman (1909) first derived the relativistic mass using
conservation of momentum. Feynman could have cited Tolman’s paper in teaching the
concept of relativistic mass because his pay was above the $20,000 mark in
1960 after he had been appointed Richard Chace Tolman Professor of Theoretical Physics (Gribbin & Gribbin, 1997). However, the formula of relativistic mass may also be expressed as m =
p/v, m = BqR/v, m
= E/c2, or m = hf/c2 instead of m0/√(1−v2/c2). Theoretically, the expression of
relativistic variation of mass with speed can be derived using the principles
of electrodynamics or the Lagrangian approach. Empirically, the dependence of the mass of an object on its speed
was also verified using the Kaufmann–Bucherer
experiments.
3. Inelastic
collision:
“Let us consider
what is commonly called an inelastic collision. For simplicity, we shall
suppose that two objects of the same kind, moving oppositely with equal speeds w… (Feynman et al.,
1963, section 16–4 Relativistic mass).”
Feynman discusses an inelastic collision in which two identical
objects moving in opposite directions with equal speeds w, hit each other and stick together, to become a new object. Essentially, he
demonstrates the additive property of relativistic mass in which the total mass
M of the new object is equal to the
sum of two relativistic mass of two particles: M = m0/√(1−u2/c2) + m0/√(1−u2/c2). One may
elaborate the combined mass using the words of Wilczek (1999), “How is it possible that massive protons and
neutrons can be built up out of strictly massless quarks and gluons? The key is
m = E/c2. There is energy stored in the motion of the
quarks, and energy in the color gluon fields that connect them. This bundling
of energy makes the proton’s mass (p. 11).” In other words, the quarks
are not stationary with respect to the combined object, proton.
Feynman says that the mass of the object
which is formed when two identical objects collide must be twice the mass of
the objects which come together. Then, he adds
that these masses have been enhanced such that the total mass “must” be greater than the rest masses of the two objects. Alternatively, it is possible to discuss the inelastic collision
without using the concept of relativistic mass. For example, Adkins (2008) suggests a variant of the inelastic collision of an object (m) with another identical object (initially at rest) that coalesce and form another
new object of mass M. Using this thought experiment, he derives the expression of
relativistic momentum p = gmv and total energy E = gmc2.
Questions for discussion:
1. What are the
reasonable assumptions needed for the concept of relativistic mass?
2. How would you derive the expression of relativistic mass using an
elastic collision?
3. How would you explain the concept of relativistic mass using an
inelastic collision?
The moral of the lesson: Feynman assumes the mass of an object which is formed when two equal objects collide
must be twice the mass of the objects which come together and in accordance with the equation, m = E/c2.
References:
1. Adkins, G. S. (2008). Energy and
momentum in special relativity. American Journal of Physics, 76(11),
1045-1047.
2. Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. (1963). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol I: Mainly mechanics, radiation, and
heat. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Feynman,
R. P., Morinigo, F. B., & Wagner, W. G. (1995). Feynman Lectures
on gravitation (B. Hatfield, ed.).
Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Gribbin J., &
Gribbin, B. (1997). Richard Feynman: A Life in Science. New York: Dutton.
5. Lewis, G. N., & Tolman, R.
C. (1909). The Principle of Relativity, and non-Newtonian mechanics. Proceedings
of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. 44(25), 711-724.
6. Wilczek, F.
(1999). Mass without mass. I: Most of matter. Physics Today, 52(11), 11-13.
No comments:
Post a Comment